Cookie preferences

Read our cookie policy

Strictly necessary

Required for the site to function. These cannot be switched off.

Always active

Analytics

Help us understand which pages are useful, so we can improve them.

Marketing

Used to measure our advertising and show you relevant content elsewhere.

Get started

Using a Beta Editor: What Works Now and What's Coming

Itamar Haim

View as Markdown (opens in a new tab)
Table of contents

Calling something a beta usually makes photographers a little wary, and that reaction is fair. Nobody wants to trust deadline sensitive work to a tool that might not hold up. The honest way to think about the new built-in editor is as a quality-first early release: what it already does, it does at a standard comparable to Lightroom, and what it does not do yet is being filled in deliberately rather than rushed. Knowing which category a given task falls into before you rely on it for a paying job is the real skill here, more than any single setting or slider.

The short version: the fundamentals are genuinely solid today, a few AI powered pieces are still catching up, and none of the gaps are hidden, they are simply part of what an honest beta looks like.

Using a Beta Editor: What Works Now and What’s Coming

What beta actually means in this editor

A beta label here does not mean unfinished or unreliable in the way that word sometimes implies. It means the core, hands-on editing experience has been built and tested to a real standard, while a smaller set of AI powered features are still being added on top of that foundation. Not every AI tool lives inside the editor yet, and being upfront about that gap is more useful to you than pretending the first version already does everything. Treat it as a strong, capable early release rather than a finished, do everything toolkit, and you will know exactly where you stand with it.

It helps to compare this to how most software actually ships. Very few tools arrive complete on day one, and the honest ones say so plainly rather than implying otherwise through careful marketing. Here, the parts built first are the ones photographers touch constantly, manual adjustment, cropping, presets, versioning, precisely because those are the tools a beta needs to get right before anything else matters.

What already works well today

The core of the editor is built around tools photographers already know how to use. Manual sliders and a histogram give you granular, real-time control over exposure, color, and contrast. Crop and straighten let you fine tune composition by hand, whether you are starting fresh or adjusting after an automated pass. Presets can be imported directly from Lightroom or built from scratch inside the new editor, so a look you already trust does not need to be rebuilt from memory. Versions let you branch a photo to try an alternate treatment without ever touching the original file underneath it.

  • Manual sliders and histogram, responding instantly, with quality comparable to Lightroom.
  • Crop and straighten, usable on their own or layered after an AI pass.
  • Presets, imported from Lightroom or built fresh, so your look travels with you.
  • Versions, for testing a different treatment risk free.

Together, these cover the large majority of day-to-day editing decisions on a typical shoot, which is exactly why it is reasonable to start using the editor now rather than waiting for a hypothetical finished version.

What a typical session looks like today

In practice, most sessions lean almost entirely on the parts of the editor that are already solid. You bring in a shoot, let your AI Profile run across it, and spend your actual editing time inside the manual tools: nudging exposure on a handful of frames, straightening a crooked horizon, pulling in a preset you already trust for a specific lighting setup. For the large majority of frames in a typical gallery, that combination is already enough to finish the job without ever reaching for a feature that has not landed yet.

The moments where the current gap actually shows up tend to be narrow and specific, usually a single frame that would benefit from a very targeted, location-specific fix. Those cases are the exception rather than the rule, which is exactly why it makes sense to build the editor into your routine now rather than waiting for every last feature to arrive first.

What is still catching up, and how that is being handled

The gap sits mainly in AI powered tools that have not all landed inside the editor yet. Rather than a fixed list with dates attached, think of it as a rolling set of additions arriving on the roadmap as the beta matures, real-time masking among them, which will eventually let you place a mask on a specific spot interactively rather than relying on other steps to get there. None of this is being promised for a particular week or month, deliberately, because a gradual rollout means the shape of “what is next” is allowed to respond to real feedback rather than a fixed plan set in stone before anyone had actually used the thing.

Refining an AI edit with manual sliders in the Imagen editor

Why it is worth using now instead of waiting

Waiting for a hypothetical complete version means missing out on real, usable improvements that are already live: faster processing, edits arriving in batches as they finish rather than all at once, and a hands-on editor sitting right next to the AI tools instead of in a separate app entirely. Familiar keyboard shortcuts and a familiar layout keep the learning curve short, so adopting it now costs you very little time even while a few pieces are still being filled in. Using it during the beta also means your feedback genuinely shapes what gets prioritized next, since the rollout is explicitly feedback-driven rather than fixed in advance.

There is also a compounding benefit to starting early that is easy to miss. The more real editing you do inside the beta, the more specific and useful your own feedback becomes, since a request grounded in an actual shoot you just finished tends to carry more weight than a general wish list. Photographers who start now are, in a small way, shaping which gaps get closed first.

Bridging the gap with Lightroom in the meantime

For anything the editor does not yet cover, Lightroom remains fully part of the picture rather than something you have to choose against. AI Profile and AI tool edits export as XMP, so that work travels cleanly into Lightroom Classic, Bridge, Photoshop, or Camera Raw, and you can also export finished JPG, TIFF, or PNG files straight from Imagen. Manual adjustments, ratings, flags, and color labels made inside Imagen’s own editor (Beta) stay with Imagen, which means the simplest path, if you know a shoot will finish in Lightroom, is to review your edits without fine tuning them first, then hand off once processing is complete. Both routes work, and choosing between them is entirely up to you and the job at hand.

This split is worth planning around rather than discovering by accident. If a shoot is going to finish in Lightroom regardless, there is little reason to spend time on manual touch ups inside Imagen first, since the simplest path just carries your AI work over and leaves the fine tuning for the environment you already know best. If a shoot is finishing entirely inside Imagen, the reverse applies, and it is worth getting comfortable with the manual tools early rather than mid deadline.

Getting comfortable with a beta tool without taking on risk

A practical way to build trust in any new tool is to start small. Run a handful of frames from a low pressure shoot through the editor before trusting it on a full paid job, and lean on versions to compare an editor treatment against your usual approach without any risk to the original file. Once a workflow feels solid on a small batch, scaling it up to a full gallery is a much smaller leap than starting there directly.

It is worth picking the right kind of shoot for that first test too. A personal project, a friend’s session, or a low stakes portrait sitting is a better proving ground than a wedding you cannot reshoot, simply because a mistake there costs you nothing but a little time. Once you have a feel for where the editor is strong and where you still prefer your old habits, moving it into paying work becomes a much smaller decision.

Our valuable tips library has more on building new tools into a reliable workflow gradually, if you want a broader framework for testing changes before they touch client work.

What’s new in Imagen: The latest Imagen is an intelligent, agentic Studio built for professional photographers, where culling, editing, review and export live in one project that you can move through in any order. Its built-in editor (Beta) is a capable early release with manual sliders, a histogram, crop and straighten, presets and versions, though it is not a full match for Lightroom and not every AI tool is inside it yet. The Studio is rolling out gradually.

Frequently asked questions

Is the built-in editor reliable enough for paid client work?

Its core tools, manual sliders, histogram, crop and straighten, presets, and versions, are built to a standard comparable to Lightroom and are solid for day-to-day use. It is still fair to test any specific AI feature on a small batch first, since not every AI tool lives inside the editor yet, particularly anything involving a brand-new AI feature you have not tried before.

What does it mean that not every AI tool is inside the editor yet?

Some AI powered tools that exist elsewhere in the product have not all been added to the built-in editor yet. They are being added on the roadmap as the beta matures, rather than promised for a specific date, so the list of what is missing today is expected to keep shrinking rather than staying fixed.

When will real-time masking be available?

It is on the roadmap for the editor, without a fixed date attached, since the rollout is designed to respond to real feedback rather than follow a schedule set before anyone had used the beta, so the safest assumption is that it arrives sometime during the gradual rollout rather than on a fixed day.

Do I have to choose between the new editor and Lightroom?

No. AI Profile and AI tool edits export to Lightroom as XMP, while manual work stays in Imagen. You can finish entirely in the new editor, hand off to Lightroom, or split the work however suits a given shoot, whichever split fits how a particular client or delivery deadline actually works.

Want to see where the beta editor already covers your workflow? Start a project in Imagen’s new Studio, where you cull, edit and export together, and try the built-in editor on your next shoot at imagen-ai.com.

Edit Less. Shoot More.

Join 10,000+ photographers getting weekly workflow hacks, business tips, and exclusive presets delivered straight to their inbox.

Be present for the work you care about.

Imagen applies your creative choices across every project, keeping your work consistent, personal, and unmistakably yours.

Try Imagen today

Accessibility options

These settings change how this site is displayed. They are saved on this device only.

Text size